.
Feedback

Patch Poll: Put Down or Spare an Accused Killer Dog?

An Allegheny County judge has set a hearing for Thursday to discuss the future of a husky dog blamed for killing its owner's newborn son. Should the judge spare the dog? Or move forward with an order to euthanize it?

In the latest twist to a controversial case, Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Edward J. Borkowski has scheduled a hearing for 9 a.m. Thursday to review the fate of a pet husky blamed for killing its owners' infant son.

The judge last week ordered the dog to be quarantined and euthanized, but he held off after for the dog. Uhring also filed an appeal on the dog's behalf, contending that other dogs also were present in the child's home and may have bitten the child.

Uhring told Forest Hills-Regent Square Patch that he views the child's death as a tragic accident and that he wants to save the dog's life.

"“I know a lot of people say I could bail on him, but I want the dog," he said. "He’s a great dog and I want to move forward.”

This week's hearing is scheduled for Room 514 in the Allegheny County Courthouse, Downtown.

The dog—called Nikko, Nico or Halo—is blamed for mauling newborn Howard Nicholson Feb. 16 after the child's mother, Brandy Furlong, left the infant in a carrier on the living-room floor in their McKeesport home. When she returned to the room, the baby was bleeding from a severe head wound and the dog's snout was bloody, authorities said. 

The baby died at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC. His death spurred renewed interest throughout Western Pennsylvania in pet-safety classes, including the Animal Friends to prepare families planning to bring babies into homes with dogs.

Borkowski last week ordered that the dog be seized and put down within 10 days, prompting Uhring to file his appeal. The judge also ordered McKeesport Animal Control Officer Ken Feree to quarantine the dog until the appeal and issues of potential dog-law violations are resolved. 

What should the judge do now?

Should he spare the dog and allow it to live on in another home? Or should he make sure the dog is put down to eliminate all risk that it attacks another human?

What do you think?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Cranberry Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Jim Hart March 7, 2012 at 01:35 pm
I've owned dogs my whole life. I love dogs. However, if one of my dogs ever bit a person unprovoked they get one behind the ear. Wouldn't even think twice. It's a dog with a life span of what, 10-12 years? Not even close to the value of a human life.
Marcyjean March 7, 2012 at 02:06 pm
I believe "Put it down. Once a killer, always a killer," was a very poor selection of words. Please give the voters another chance and just have the option to choose "put it down."
Michelle L. March 8, 2012 at 12:00 am
In this case, I would say let it live. The mother was being irresponsible. Who would leave their newborn baby alone with an animal? The blame shouldn't be placed entirely on the dog. The mother left the poor child on the ground with the dog for ten minutes. How hard is it to place the baby in another room with the door closed? The dog should have never gotten the opportunity in the first place, Education is obviously needed.
samantha March 8, 2012 at 01:54 am
uh hello this was a NEWBORN baby 2 to 3 days old who leaves a baby on the floor and the poor dog didn't even know what the baby even was, he probably thought it was a toy or something.. for the shame on the mother.
Danielle Scherer March 8, 2012 at 01:27 pm
When we bring animals into our homes, their actions become our responsibility. We can't blame the animals.
Bill Painter March 8, 2012 at 05:06 pm
The dog killed a human, the dog needs to be put down.
AJ March 8, 2012 at 08:02 pm
parents fault sorry. I let our dog sleep with my daughters blanket b4 bringing her home, for 3 days. my dog is the sweetest dog in the world and I would of never ever put my baby on the ground and walk away. that's just irresponsible. also I don't know if this happened in this case but look how dogs pick up their puppies...
RoastPuppy June 20, 2012 at 05:04 am
I agree with Jim Hart. If a dog so much as nipped a child, it would be history, because no matter how highly I valued it as a pet, it is, after all, just another animal, no better than the pigs, chickens and cows butchered at the slaughter house. This being said, the mother of this child had the killer and three other large dogs in her home along with two other children, she is on welfare, yet, she had another child. If she has to depend on the taxpayers to feed, clothe and house her family, how the heck did she manage to feed and care for four huge dogs?! Answer: She didn't you and I (the taxpayers) fed and paid the vet bills for those worthless fleabags! The dog should be euthanized immediately -- shooting would be my preference, but the dog freaks wouldn't stand for that -- and this irresponsible mother should lose custody of her two remaining children, lose all government benefits and be forced to get a job and do something besides have children and adopt dogs!
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Sinichak (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 08:58 am
Animal Friends submits a blog under "Local Voices" to all the Pittsburgh area Patch sitesRead More every week. The shelter in Butler County, and indeed anyone who lives in the community, also is welcome to submit a blog and have their voices heard under our Local Voices section.