.
Feedback

Trading Gold for Pennies: Corbett Sells PA's Natural Gas to the Lowest Bidder While Continuing to Make Drastic Cuts in Education

Governor Corbett is giving away PA's most valuable resource while guaranteeing residents almost nothing in return.

I admit that I did not pay much attention to the election that put Gov. Tom Corbett in his post, but we are all paying for that apathy now as Corbett gives away Pennsylvania’s milk (natural gas) for free while neglecting the welfare of the cow (education, social services, etc).  

Cranberry and surrounding area residents are currently experiencing tax hikes, firings and hiring freezes in the public education system—and annual tuition hikes for college students—while Corbett sells our natural gas at bargain basement prices, leaving residents with little more than speculative benefits.  

In Corbett’s education plan for Pennsylvania, he states that he understands that economic growth and prosperity starts with education, which he claims to want to improve through increasing a student’s opportunity to leave a failing school district, and by “cutting the strings from Harrisburg.” 

For the most part, I could not agree more.

Education plays an enormous part in the successful future of a community, especially if those educated then go on to remain within the community. (For Corbett’s full education policy click here

A little more than one year ago, Corbett released his first budget, dealing a devastating blow to public and higher education and causing a palpable tension amongst those professors and assistant professors who had yet to achieve tenure.

Corbett was quoted in a WPXI article that he would separate the “must-haves from the nice-to-haves.”  He removed $260 million in grants for elementary education and planned to cut a monstrous 50 percent from state-run universities.  

Recently, the   Some believe part of the problem is the increased popularity of charter schools, which do not have to meet the same requirements as public schools (teacher certification, approved learning material, etc). Others believe that pensions for teachers are a drain on public education funds.  

In light of Corbett’s continued advertising to gas companies, it would seem that Corbett himself is confused about who is in need of government service.

Could there be an institution in this nation that is more “must-have” than public education, while a lucrative deal with natural gas companies would simply be “nice-to-have” unless said deal were to benefit the public education system directly? 

Apparently, Gov. Corbett believes that private industries (specifically gas companies) are more in need than the public education system. It was recently leaked to the public that Corbett plans . This is a company that made $36 billion dollars just last year.  

Corbett is betting—with no guarantee—that this tax cut will provide 400 jobs while sacrificing a potential gold mine in tax revenue. While these jobs may or may not arrive to Pennsylvania, the public education system is firing more and more employees while instituting hiring freezes across counties.

Why are we, as a state, granting private industries enormous tax breaks while West Virginia and Texas are generating two to four times more tax revenue per well? 

This is tax revenue that could be saving jobs and improving the quality of public education (For more information on Corbett’s big business tax cuts, click here).

In order to placate the concerned constituents, Corbett enacted an “Impact Fee” on drilling companies that’s enforcement is optional to individual counties.

If enacted, Butler County is set up to receive $150,000 to $1 million locally while the rest goes back to state government. Something is better than nothing, but this nothing might as well be nothing considering Seneca Valley School District’s debt and expenses alone, and there is absolutely no guarantee that any of this money will go back into the public education system, which Corbett has declared a “nice-to-have.” (For more information, click here)

The whole situation is deeply confusing, and intentionally made confusing so that voters must spend hours researching the true intentions of their state government or rely on oversimplified headlines for their information. 

Corbett knows who butters his bread, but he also knows that he needs his constituent’s votes to keep in a job. By giving the local governments this Impact Fee option, Corbett hopes to placate the masses while giving gas companies an ever freer reign over drilling locations. 

Gov. Corbett has lost my support completely, as he seems to be selling us off to the highest bidder as our children and those in need are forced to sacrifice a quality public education that grows with support of the community, rather than its current state of shrivel as a result of neglect. 

Pittsburgh has a booming health industry, as well as science and technology industries, closely tied to research universities such as Carnegie Mellon, Penn State and the University of Pittsburgh.

I understand that Pennsylvania and local communities could use this money, but PA has the goods—that without—these natural gas companies could not exist. 

We need a governor with a vision for future industry endeavors who will guarantee jobs and an allocation of funds into our state universities and public education systems. 


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Cranberry Patch? Find your Local Patch »

HW June 20, 2012 at 01:13 pm
test
Matt Gerginski June 20, 2012 at 01:48 pm
Got it!
Matt Gerginski June 20, 2012 at 03:07 pm
I do appreciate that Corbett has delivered a balanced budget, but I question the priority of the cuts that have delivered it. Specifically, I refer to the 50% reduction in higher education funding.
From a budgeting perspective, it is easy to view higher education as a shaggy cost in need of a haircut. And it is an easy trim to barber when you can pass the buck to the universities and students. But the truth is that education is more than a present-day cost; it is an investment for tomorrow. And it is also true that, increasingly, higher education is not a "nice-to-have," it is a necessity. So allow me measure up some priorities and offer some perspective, directly from the 2012-13 Pennsylvania State budget: * $1.38b -- Higher Education * $1.60b -- Lottery Fund (Talk about investment!) * $2.00b -- Prisons, Probation, and Parole (Did you know that there is a negative correlation between education and crime?) Glad to see higher education bringing up the rear, right behind raffles and cages... just sayin' ;-) Thanks for the post!
Art Wegweiser June 21, 2012 at 03:55 pm
Corbett is simply following the standard GOP line of giving away and privatizing as many of the people's assets as they can think of and giving them away to their buddies.
He and the creeps in our legislature think it all belongsrt to them. Stupidity at the polls put them all there.
Art Wegweiser June 26, 2012 at 04:26 pm
Perhaps our Corbett might consider not constructing ever more prisons and hiring personnel to staff them (or giving them away to private corporations). We have far too many people locked up and too long for non-violent and sometimes even trivial crimes and at great expense. Prisons simply makes smarter criminals out of those incarcerated, that costs us and then they are back in again. "Corrections" is a joke.
The "Corrections" industry loves the system. More criminals = more profit for them.
Matt Gerginski June 26, 2012 at 08:06 pm
So true. (Just google "prison industrial complex")
In fact, as a country, the United States has the highest per-capita incarceration rate in the world. I'm assuming that by trivial crimes, you are referring to victimless crimes whereby no person or property has been harmed. Some conservative estimates indicate that one-third of the prison population have been incarcerated for victimless crimes. And lets not forget that the "great expense" includes more than just cages and guards; it includes enforcement, prosecution, and judicial costs; plus the opportunity cost of having able persons trapped in cages rather than fulfilling productive jobs. Yes, more criminals means more profit... profit that is subsidized by the taxpayer. How much does this subsidy cost Pennsylvania's taxpayers? Allow me to provide some more perspective and to bring us full-circle back to education... last year in Pennsylvania, the state spent more than $35k per inmate, while spending only $5.3k per student in public education. Sad but true. Once again, the priorities just don't add up.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Sinichak (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 08:58 am
Animal Friends submits a blog under "Local Voices" to all the Pittsburgh area Patch sitesRead More every week. The shelter in Butler County, and indeed anyone who lives in the community, also is welcome to submit a blog and have their voices heard under our Local Voices section.