patching...
Update: Spread the word about Cranberry Patch in the community! Follow us on Twitter and on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/CranberryPatch »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

How Do You Define the Middle Class in America?

Both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama define it as up to $250,000. But not all Americans might agree.

 

How you define "middle-income" Americans might depend on where you view your own household income in relationship to others.

On Friday, Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney defined it as income of $200,000 to $250,000 a year and less. And President Barack Obama, the Democratic candidate, has set his definition for “middle class” as families with income of up to $250,000 a year.

But are their viewpoints accurate and in touch with the way the average American views the middle class?

The federal Census Bureau reported this week that the median household income — the midpoint for the nation — is just over $50,000. Pennsylvania ranks 37th out of the 50 states with a median household income of $50,087.

The Tax Policy Center placed the median household at about $42,000 in cash income in 2011. Households earning $250,000 fall somewhere just above the 96th percentile for all incomes in America.

To put the numbers in perspective, the official poverty line was an annual income of $23,050 for a family of four in 2012, according to the federal Department of Health and Human Services.

So, how would you define the middle class in America? Take our poll and, if you choose, tell us why you think so in the comment section below.

  • Where Does Middle Class End and Upper Class Begin?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • $50,000
        6 (8%)
    • $75,000
        9 (12%)
    • $100,000
        18 (24%)
    • $150,000
        20 (26%)
    • $200,000
        11 (14%)
    • $250,000
        11 (14%)
    Total votes: 75
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Census Bureau, Defining middle class, Median Income, Obama, Poverty, Romney, and middle class

Roger

11:26 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012

Why does it matter? Why would one definition over another be better or worse?

Is this another story with a meaningless poll to drive up traffic counts, and generate comments by the same posters (with the same content) as every other political thread?

Reply

Stephanie Davis

8:43 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012

My goodness!! You seem like an angry person, Roger. Just stop reading PATCH if you don't like it. Obviously, your opinion is not everyone's choice and the purpose of PATCH, I believe, is to generate news and thought/opinion regardless of whether YOU approve of content or purpose. It is not thoughtful or even appropriate to harass people with opinions which differ from yours.

Reply
Comment_arrow

cc

1:09 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

Stephanie Davis, I so agree with you. The ones on here that harass others are the ones that live miserable lives and think they should be handed every thing on a silver spoon. I happen to like reading what some people write. Others I quit wasting time reading what they write until the start an attack.

Comment_arrow

Mike

8:15 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

cc - You're one of the main offenders on Patch when it comes to inappropriate behavior.

Comment_arrow

cc

8:27 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

no ml is one of the main offenders of the patch and now you Mike.

Comment_arrow

Mike

8:27 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

cc - Isn't it time to make up a new derogatory term for the President of the United States? That's certainly proven quite a lot.

Comment_arrow

cc

9:01 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

EDITOR, I WOULD LIKE MIKES NAME REMOVED FROM HERE BECAUSE HE IS ON A PERSONAL ATTACK OF ME.

bill philpott

10:09 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012

Interesting survey. I thought 200,000 was right but I guess with the shrinking incomes that is too high.

Reply

Patrick Ogburn

10:46 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012

I don't think Roger's questions and comments are evidence of anger - he seemed fairly dispassionate and asked a relevant question. It would not be inapproproate, Stephanie, to heed your own words.

I also think that it would be useful to not lose sight of why the income range of "middle class" is relevant. If anyone can elucidate that, it might be a useful perspective that would add to this thread. I am tempted to leave it as intuitively obvious that it matters, but Roger's comment challenged me to think about it. Upon reflection, I'm not sure it's all that clear why it matters - it seems, at a minimum, to be of secondary importance. I'm not sure what social or governmental issue will be solved or clarified by settling on an income level that defines a social class.

Reply

James Dale Barrington

10:52 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012

Average may be the better word to use when speaking of a local area then the word median, however, since this is a national perspective - rural and urban and the in between, a career or vocation or the most expedient employment - they all do the same thing; pay the rent. Our two major candidates for the big house are thinking of the high end of the middle class, like 2% or 3% of them. -- Wishful thinking. I would think that 40,000 to 60,000 as the lower end of the middle class, 61,000 to 150,000 as the middle, and 151,000 to 250,000 as the high end. Since retiring it is easy for me to see that I belonged to another day.

Reply

a mom

11:58 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012

Elucidate: to make clear or lucid. Somebody has been enriching their word power. I love words!

Reply

cc

1:17 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

This would be a great question for middle and high school teachers to ask their students in Social Studies. My nephew who teaches World History at Peters is going to put this question to them on Monday.

Reply

Debra Phelan

1:33 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

It depends where you live. I lived in D.C. 37 years, so the bracket would end at $200,000-$250,000. But now I live in Wexford, and I'm not sure what it would be, although I'm pretty sure it would be less.

Reply
Comment_arrow

cc

1:52 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

Debra agree, cost of Living is very expensive when you live inside Washington DC, same with New York and a few other cities. I always thought Middle Class went from 40,000 to 125,000 in Pittsburgh.

Comment_arrow

Janis OD

1:30 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Debra...same here. I moved to PA 2 years ago after living in DC Metropolitan area my whole life. Incomes are relatively low here mostly due to the lack of federal govenment's far-reaching effect as compared to DC area. Between federal employee wages and federal contractors plus so many two-income earning homes, the wages are higher but so then is the cost of living - specifically housing costs.

Jon Wain

3:06 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

cc , right on with those esimates.These are the folks for the most part living some what happier than the rest.Blue collar as referred to in the past.They are the ones you see at armsrtongs, water front, bars and the meadows casino.ya we put our kids through college ,help them and our parents survive but we get up ,go to work ,make a living and do it all over again.by the way i make 122 ,000 a year and paid more taxes than romney showed on his returns on 20,000,000

Reply
Comment_arrow

cc

4:30 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

Jon do you know the actual amount Romney paid on Income tax for the 20,000,000 that he made.

Comment_arrow

Tina D

10:45 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Jon do you know how much Obama paid in taxes, he was in a lower tax bracket than you, so before you start spouting off political BS you should have the whole facts in front of you.

maureen

3:11 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

It seems to me that those of us who work everyday tryin to raise our families the best we can will never get a head. Something always comes up

Reply
Comment_arrow

cc

4:04 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

maureen, i found a way to come out ahead every month. I don't pay thousand of dollars in interest on credit cards every year to banks to make them rich. I have one credit card in case my car breaks down on the road. I pay cash for everything and don't buy on the spur of the moment. I follow a budget and save for things that breaks. I am still using older model TV's in my home and when they break I will replace. When stainless steel appliances came out all my neighbors ran out and bought and tossed their appliances out on the curb, nothing wrong with them but had to have new.
Each of my children at home (1 high-school, 2 college) have a loadable credit card and they got so much money on their card to go "back to school shopping" and when the money ran out they were done shopping. My children get their allowances on their cards too and they learned if you spend your money the first week then your broke for the rest of the month.
If people learn to live within their means and without credit cards they would find out how better off they are financially instead of making banks rich. Granted you need to take a loan out on a home or a car, but for anything else, cash is the way to go. I have 2 Hyundai Elantra paid for in cash and don't need a 40,000 car payment.

Comment_arrow

NE12Ukid

9:57 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

Paying cash is one good way to stay out of debt.
Another is using a credit card and earning bonuses, but always paying it off in full each month. That is my choice.
Either will help keep one out of debt.
I like that using one credit card for groceries, gas, clothing purchases, etc earns me $200-400 bonus cash each year.
I have another card that gives me discounts on certain travel expenses, and my bonus from the first card gives me spending money for items not prepaid on my vacation such as tips to workers and other incidentals.
Of course this also takes discipline, some people just don't have that quality.
This is how some middle class sink to lower class---debt!
I also plan a budget each year, and review it monthly. Whatever is left after all bills are paid each month goes directly into the savings.
That is, IMO, another aspect of financial stability, having savings. I think that Suze Orman says everyone should have 8 months expenses set aside in savings, just in case. That is quite a task for some, but aiming to put aside at least 6 months is a good goal.

Comment_arrow

NE12Ukid

10:02 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

I would add that some people need to realize also that an annual vacation is not a right, it should be earned. Not everyone can afford that, they may not earn enough, or they may just have other expenses that need to come first. Such as many families who used to vacation each year give that up while they have children in college.
But some think they are entitled to the pricey vacation week or two, and go ahead and spend that money when they have debts that should be paid down, or they have little to no savings.
I also think that to maintain a car and keep it as long as possible, well at least that works for me. My current car is almost 11 years old, and I am looking at new models to see what I might like for my next car. But I do already have the money for a new car set aside, no car payment for me. I save up the price of the car before I buy it, then while I own it I continue to put some aside each month so that when I need a new car, I have the money.
Again, it takes discipline, and sticking to a budget. Everyone can do it, but it's harder the less you have coming in each month, and if you get hit with a large unexpected expense.

NE12Ukid

3:32 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

To define where "middle class" ends, one must define what is the next level up? Is it upper middle, or is it upper class, and what how is that described?
IMO it is more of a description of a lifestyle than a certain number of dollars per year.
Certainly not just wages, as some live off investments, moreso in the "uppers" than in the "middle" but then consider some seniors who live off investments.
One thing for sure, its not the millionaires and billionaires in the middle class.
Though one in the middle class might have 1 or 2 million in TOTAL assets, not liquid assets or income.

Reply

James Dale Barrington

7:13 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

cc- I agree with you fully and wished everyone was so frugal, but Maureen is making a real point that reflects society's present moment, I think. She said, 'something is always coming up,' meaning, that 'living within her means' is in conflict again and then again with reality. If our 'means' is great enough they, too, may be able to pay for their children's college and pay cash for their car, -- but, too, many are not so fortunate. Living within your means is the key, -- but that has become a problem for the bread and butter indispensables some people need as an on-going battle for living weekly and monthly. Getting another job or an additional job may not be an option. Still, your advice is right on target. You have been lucky enough to be the beneficiary of a good job.

Reply
Comment_arrow

cc

9:34 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

James agree, I lost my husband to cancer and raised 5 children on my own, the youngest doesn't even remember her father as she was just over a year. It was a big struggle because I had to get a job because SS didn't cut it, pay for daycare, feed and put clothes on the kids because they were all growing. I went to college to at night and on the weekends for business management and one of our first assignments in accounting was making a budget and figuring out where our money went and living on the budget we made for 3 months. I was in for a rude shock when I seen how much money I was handing to the bank on interest on charge cards, mortgage and on car payments and from that day I made my budget, I swore I would never use the credit card unless it was an emergency. Once I did pay the charge cards off, I couldn't actually believe how much money I was able to bank away for those rainy days. I learned a valuable lesson in that accounting class and still live with a budget today. I don't need to buy a new car because my neighbor gets a new one every 3 years, or have the newest TV out on the market because they are in 3-D and 65 inches. I also have taught my children the value of a money and what it would actually cost if they placed it on a charge vs saving for something they want.

Jon Wain

9:19 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

mitt romney earned $42,500,000 in the past two years.on that he paid$ 6,200,000 or 13 percent in taxes.Diane Sawyer reported this on abc news a while back

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tina D

10:49 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

I know its useless trying to reach an obama supporter but at least Mitt Romney employed thousands of people in all his business ventures, all obama did was unemploy millions of people

Comment_arrow

Mike

11:14 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Tina D - Can you supply the numbers for the amount of people Mitt Romney has given full time employment to vs. the amount of people that have lost their jobs due to decisions he and Bain Capital have made.

Comment_arrow

Bob Howard

2:29 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Tina D --- I would not consider it useless trying to reach an Obama supporter. I have talked to hundreds of people that regret their 2008 vote for Obama and will not be voting for Obama again.

Comment_arrow

Tina D

11:02 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Mike I don't have the numbers of the people he employed but I have the number that Obama has unemployed 20+ million

Comment_arrow

Tina D

11:04 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Another number is 70 million, thats what obama took out of medicare to pay for obamacare....

Comment_arrow

NE12Ukid

11:28 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Tina, I understand your enthusiasm for your candidate, but you really should check your facts before repeating what Faux News or Rush said.

Comment_arrow

Tina D

11:33 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

CNN has already reported it, its not a secret anymore

Comment_arrow

NE12Ukid

8:11 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Tina, can you please cite some EVIDENCE about your 70 million claim, thank you.

Comment_arrow

Mike

8:23 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Tina - Were you dressed like a magician when you pulled those imaginary numbers out of thin air? Did you say Presto! or Abra Cadabra!

Comment_arrow

Tina D

7:43 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

If it was that easy Mike I would fix the extra 6 trillion deficit....FYI my number was wrong about how much obama took from medicare, its 716 billion, go to ABC.com website, of course they justify why he took that out of medicare..... NE you did a novel on entitlement, obama is all about entitlement for people not making a "middle class" or " rich class" salary, I can't imagine after reading your financial story that you would be willing to pay for someone else's college education, housing, or even vacation that didn't make as much as you or is on welfare....

cc

10:59 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

Mitt Romney didn't write the tax laws. Obama didn't either, it was the ones in Washington that wrote those tax laws for their buddies how many years ago.

Explain to me how obama had an adjusted gross income of $1,728,096 and only paid $453,77 in taxes but when you figure it out to their tax bracket that they why didn't they pay the $573,973 which was actually owed to the IRS?

I still would rather see Romney in office as he said he wouldn't take a salary for the 4 years he is in office and won't subject the Citizens of the United States to pay for all their own vacations.

Now take obama and his wife whom they think they are entitled to take as many as they want vacations costing millions to us tax payers. I still can't get over why US citizens had to pay for michelle to take her daughter and 40 of her closest friends and friends to Spain for a 4 day vacation which cost over 1 million to us tax payers. This trip should of been added on to their income taxes as it didn't benefit anyone but michelle, her daughter and her friends and relatives. Their 11 day trip to Hawaii cost Americans another 4 million, again another vacation that should of been added on to their income tax. We as Citizens should only being paying for travel and Secret Service, they should actually be paying for their own hotels, food and everything else they purchase, but somehow stick Americans with the bill for the whole trip.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tina D

10:50 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

cc I absolutely agree, funny how the main stream media doesn't report on the money obama has made, or the tax bracket he was in (13%), but he sure likes spending our money!

Comment_arrow

cc

8:38 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Tina I so agree with you. He is in a 13% tax bracket just as Romney but people want to see Romney income taxes. Were only suppose to provide security for their trips but how did Americans end up paying for the whole trips. that is what his entitlement is, give everything to king obmaa. I can't wait to see him leave office and plan on throwing a big party

Comment_arrow

NE12Ukid

8:18 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

There is no 13% "tax bracket" in the US at this time.

Comment_arrow

NE12Ukid

8:20 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

cc asks "Explain to me how obama had an adjusted gross income of $1,728,096 and only paid $453,77...'

Since Obama's returnsHAVE been released you can certainly look at them and see what deductions were taken.

Bob Howard

12:17 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Middle class is defined by the political class for purposes of exploitation not in terms of economics. They reveal their fundamental values and principles by the way they exploit "class warfare" and "economic struggle." Middle class is defined not only by income but also wealth and attitudes toward the utility of money. That is why we know people with incomes of $35 thousand that consider themselves middle class and others with incomes of $100 thousand that consider themselves poor.

Reply

cc

8:40 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I consider myself living comfortably not a class. I do know I pay for my family and myself. obama has no right to tell anyone about entitlement. Entitlement is going out and doing for yourself.

Reply

Jason Bahr

10:41 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Defining “middle class” by an absolute income level without taking geography into consideration is further evidence how flawed this entire discussion is. If you make $75,000 and live in NYC – you cannot possibly compare that to making $75,000 and living in Gary, Indiana? “Middle Class” meant something at one time when I was younger. (1) Middle class meant that you were able to support yourself and you believed your kids would be able to do the same someday – maybe they might be able to do a little better than you? (2) You had a chance to find better jobs and better yourself. That is it. It did not mean that you started out at a minimum wage job when you were 21 yrs old and hope the gov’t would raise the minimum wage every year until you retired.

Reply

Leave a comment